To be blunt, I guess communication can be thought of in certain ways, depending on factors, but maybe also depending on a person's current mood or moods, their [memory retention] and [recollection pattern] (based on you know more like how and what we [recollect] suppose more of the negatives or positives? the [perspectives] we have and get, how narration works for them when narrating, either they plan to tell a story to others or just convey [objectively] what happened, their [capacity to articulate], how they [perceive threats], [perspectives of value], how they [exchange value], etc.).
What I Mean by:
-> Memory retention: What I am trying to mean here is the actual process of how everyone stores memory/data into their brains - some might remember more of how they feel, some might remember an event on how only they were harmed/benefited, etc.
-> Recollection pattern: This is a term that I want to use to convey how we specifically try to remember, just like how we actively store how we felt. Some people, only consiously / sub-consiously, can recollect what they felt rather than what actually happened.
-> Recollect: Like the act of remembering in context terms - but the book definition is bringing a memory back to mind.
-> Perspectives: The word in this context is trying to convey the way everyone sees things in their own lens - example: though a cubeiod exsists in a room, one person in the room might have a perpective of it being a square - the word does not intent to address the reality point or the truth point but only alligns to how people precieve/see through their lens the reality around them.
-> Objectively: I am trying to frame this as non-controversially as possible, feel free to go through other meanings - here, primarily, I want to convey objectively is the act of viewing, using a truth lens (the truth of anything would be binary, right? Yes or No at an atomic scale of things) with no biases and grasping reality around them
-> Capacity to articulate - this is about how there are limits to one's own capacity to make words of their own thoughts. I am sure for a lot of us, a lot of times, the words just don't come to our mouths. Though mainly it might be due to unclear recollection. But a lot more times too, even though you know what you want to say as an idea in your brain, u cannot put words into your mouth because you do not possess the vocabulary for it. That is the limit of their articulation (articulation: successful conversion of mental thoughts as intended into speech)
-> Perceive threats: how one might see threats through their lens of reality.
-> Perspectives of value: now everything is equally valuable to everyone, this basic fundamental would be due to how we see things of value differently compared to others, right?
-> Exchange value: though some things might be of value or of no value at a point, but during the exchange, what value both parties see in the receivings is what the value to be considered.
0 comments